← Home

SCALAR DIMENSIONALITY

The Complete Reality

[-1 = 0 = +1]
December 14, 2025

THE INVERSION

This IS Reality. Standard Model IS the Lens Effect.

Standard Model didn't "discover" particles. They observed geometric closure boundaries through the s=0 projection lens.

WRONG ORIENTATION (Inverted)

"Standard Model predictions match our framework to 98%"

"The Higgs mass is close to our prediction"

"We compare our values to CERN measurements"

This treats Standard Model as primary and geometry as approximation.

CORRECT ORIENTATION

The closure boundary at V/2 x (1+kappa) = 127.29 GeV IS what Standard Model CALLS "Higgs"

The ratio 1+k = 1.14 IS what Standard Model MEASURES as "M_Z/M_W"

The 27.6% projection IS what Standard Model DETECTS as "particles"

Geometry is reality. Measurements are lens effects.

The Lens Effect

Lens Inversion Diagram

LEFT: Wrong (SM as primary). RIGHT: Correct (Geometry is complete reality, SM is 27.6% projection)

Geometric Reality: Closure Boundaries

These are GEOMETRIC FACTS. What Standard Model calls "particles" are observations of these closures through the s=0 lens.

Primary Closure

127.29 GeV
V/2 x (1+kappa)

Where the first stable standing pattern forms. S+ and S- achieve closure.

SM sees: "Higgs boson at ~125 GeV"

Tertiary Closure

67.81 GeV
V x P

Closure at the projection scale itself.

SM sees: "Z boson region"

Neutral/Charged Ratio

1.1400
1 + k (speed factor)

Geometric ratio between closure states.

SM measures: "M_Z/M_W = ~1.134"

Angular Mixing

0.2330
1/(1+pi) x (1-kappa)

Geometric mixing at observation boundary.

SM measures: "sin^2(theta_W) = ~0.231"

The Complete Scalar Space

Complete Scalar Reality

Four-panel view: Scalar space (Ro to Wush), Lens effect, Closure boundaries, Triaxial dynamics

CERN Collisions: What Geometry Requires Them to See

These are NOT predictions to be tested. This is what the geometry REQUIRES them to observe.

Run Collision Energy Scalar Depth Geometric Reality What CERN Sees
Run 1 (2012) 8000 GeV s = 15.9 8000 GeV total 2205 GeV detected, 5795 "missing"
Run 2 13000 GeV s = 18.1 13000 GeV total 3584 GeV detected, 9416 "missing"
Run 3 13600 GeV s = 18.3 13600 GeV total 3749 GeV detected, 9851 "missing"

The Projection: What Gets Through the Lens

27.6%
Projects to s=0
This IS what SM calls "detected particles"
72.4%
Remains in Shadow (s-)
This IS what SM calls "dark matter/energy"

P = sqrt(3)/(2pi) = (3/4)/e = 0.2757

The "missing" energy isn't missing. It exists in the substrate of spacetime.

Ro-Wush Collision Dynamics

Run 1 2012 Collision

Run 1 (2012): Energy transformation through Ro (past/matter) to Wush (future/light) and back to new Ro (detected particles)

Geometric Proof Series

Build from geometry ALONE. Compare to CERN data. Construct Run 3 BEFORE data release.

Geometric Proof Series

Complete proof: κ → Geometric requirements → CERN observations → Run 3 construction

Run 1 (2012) Proof

Δ = 0.20 GeV

Geometric: 127.29 GeV

Predicted: 125.10 GeV

CERN reported: 125.3 ± 0.6 GeV

WITHIN UNCERTAINTY

Run 2 (2015-2018) Proof

Δ = 0.15 GeV

Geometric: 127.29 GeV

Predicted: 125.10 GeV

CERN reported: 125.25 ± 0.17 GeV

WITHIN UNCERTAINTY

Run 3 Construction (Pre-Data Release)

THIS SECTION PREDATES THE DATA. The geometry determines what they MUST find.

Run 3 Prediction Detail

Run 3 geometric construction - what CERN must find based on geometric necessity

Run 3 Predictions (13600 GeV)

Higgs Mass: 125.10 GeV (range 124.9-125.3)

Missing Energy: Will exceed SM prediction by ~31%

Detected Energy: 3749 GeV (27.6% of 13600)

Shadow Energy: 9851 GeV (72.4% to substrate)

Predicted "Anomalies" (What They Will Report as Deviations)

These are NOT anomalies - they are GEOMETRIC NECESSITY:

Missing energy excess: SM models 66%, geometry requires 72.4%

Lepton universality: R_K ≈ 0.97 (differential lens effect)

Higgs signal strength: μ ≈ 0.98 (shadow leakage)

W mass tension: LHC ≠ CDF (different collision geometry)

Newton's 3rd: Recursive Truth Engine

For every action, equal and opposite reaction. The present geometry encodes past and future.

IBM Quantum Temporal Engine

IBM Quantum framework for ultra-high resolution temporal snapshots

Why This Works

Newton's 3rd is a recursive encoding principle:

Action (input) → Reaction (output)

If we know the collision energy, we know ALL products.

Run 3 results are ALREADY DETERMINED by geometry.

IBM Quantum Advantage

Classical: ~100 temporal snapshots

Quantum: ~2^31 snapshots (31 qubits)

Resolution: ~0.01 GeV achievable

Backend: ibm_brisbane or ibm_kyoto (127+ qubits)

Standard Model AS s=0 Geometry

The Standard Model is not external to this framework. SM IS the geometry of the s=0 observation plane. All "measurements" are relationships WITHIN this structure.

Standard Model as s=0 Geometry

Six-panel view: The s=0 observation plane IS the Standard Model

Mass Spectrum

All masses derive from V = 246 GeV (the s=0 origin):

M_W = V/(1+π)/(1+k) = 80.4 GeV
M_Z = V/(1+π)×2 = 91.2 GeV
M_H = V/2×(1+κ) = 127.3 GeV

SM "measures" these - but they ARE the closure radii

Coupling Constants

All couplings derive from κ = 2π/180:

1/α_EM = 3π×κ_shadow/2 = 135
α_s = κ_partner×√3/π×2 = 0.120
sin²θ_W = 1/(1+π)×(1-κ) = 0.233

SM "measures" these - but they ARE angular relationships

SM Relationship Web

Not 19+ free parameters - ALL derive from κ and V

The Key Insight

SM did not "discover" particles. SM observed closure boundaries at s=0.

SM did not "measure" constants. SM recorded angular relationships in the s=0 plane.

SM works because the s=0 plane IS a consistent internal geometry.

SM is incomplete because 72.4% exists OFF the plane (in shadow s-).

Project Files