The Complete Reality
"Standard Model predictions match our framework to 98%"
"The Higgs mass is close to our prediction"
"We compare our values to CERN measurements"
This treats Standard Model as primary and geometry as approximation.
The closure boundary at V/2 x (1+kappa) = 127.29 GeV IS what Standard Model CALLS "Higgs"
The ratio 1+k = 1.14 IS what Standard Model MEASURES as "M_Z/M_W"
The 27.6% projection IS what Standard Model DETECTS as "particles"
Geometry is reality. Measurements are lens effects.
LEFT: Wrong (SM as primary). RIGHT: Correct (Geometry is complete reality, SM is 27.6% projection)
These are GEOMETRIC FACTS. What Standard Model calls "particles" are observations of these closures through the s=0 lens.
Where the first stable standing pattern forms. S+ and S- achieve closure.
SM sees: "Higgs boson at ~125 GeV"
Closure at the projection scale itself.
SM sees: "Z boson region"
Geometric ratio between closure states.
SM measures: "M_Z/M_W = ~1.134"
Geometric mixing at observation boundary.
SM measures: "sin^2(theta_W) = ~0.231"
Four-panel view: Scalar space (Ro to Wush), Lens effect, Closure boundaries, Triaxial dynamics
These are NOT predictions to be tested. This is what the geometry REQUIRES them to observe.
| Run | Collision Energy | Scalar Depth | Geometric Reality | What CERN Sees |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 (2012) | 8000 GeV | s = 15.9 | 8000 GeV total | 2205 GeV detected, 5795 "missing" |
| Run 2 | 13000 GeV | s = 18.1 | 13000 GeV total | 3584 GeV detected, 9416 "missing" |
| Run 3 | 13600 GeV | s = 18.3 | 13600 GeV total | 3749 GeV detected, 9851 "missing" |
P = sqrt(3)/(2pi) = (3/4)/e = 0.2757
The "missing" energy isn't missing. It exists in the substrate of spacetime.
Run 1 (2012): Energy transformation through Ro (past/matter) to Wush (future/light) and back to new Ro (detected particles)
Build from geometry ALONE. Compare to CERN data. Construct Run 3 BEFORE data release.
Complete proof: κ → Geometric requirements → CERN observations → Run 3 construction
Geometric: 127.29 GeV
Predicted: 125.10 GeV
CERN reported: 125.3 ± 0.6 GeV
WITHIN UNCERTAINTY
Geometric: 127.29 GeV
Predicted: 125.10 GeV
CERN reported: 125.25 ± 0.17 GeV
WITHIN UNCERTAINTY
THIS SECTION PREDATES THE DATA. The geometry determines what they MUST find.
Run 3 geometric construction - what CERN must find based on geometric necessity
Higgs Mass: 125.10 GeV (range 124.9-125.3)
Missing Energy: Will exceed SM prediction by ~31%
Detected Energy: 3749 GeV (27.6% of 13600)
Shadow Energy: 9851 GeV (72.4% to substrate)
These are NOT anomalies - they are GEOMETRIC NECESSITY:
• Missing energy excess: SM models 66%, geometry requires 72.4%
• Lepton universality: R_K ≈ 0.97 (differential lens effect)
• Higgs signal strength: μ ≈ 0.98 (shadow leakage)
• W mass tension: LHC ≠ CDF (different collision geometry)
For every action, equal and opposite reaction. The present geometry encodes past and future.
IBM Quantum framework for ultra-high resolution temporal snapshots
Newton's 3rd is a recursive encoding principle:
If we know the collision energy, we know ALL products.
Run 3 results are ALREADY DETERMINED by geometry.
Classical: ~100 temporal snapshots
Quantum: ~2^31 snapshots (31 qubits)
Backend: ibm_brisbane or ibm_kyoto (127+ qubits)
The Standard Model is not external to this framework. SM IS the geometry of the s=0 observation plane. All "measurements" are relationships WITHIN this structure.
Six-panel view: The s=0 observation plane IS the Standard Model
All masses derive from V = 246 GeV (the s=0 origin):
SM "measures" these - but they ARE the closure radii
All couplings derive from κ = 2π/180:
SM "measures" these - but they ARE angular relationships
Not 19+ free parameters - ALL derive from κ and V
SM did not "discover" particles. SM observed closure boundaries at s=0.
SM did not "measure" constants. SM recorded angular relationships in the s=0 plane.
SM works because the s=0 plane IS a consistent internal geometry.
SM is incomplete because 72.4% exists OFF the plane (in shadow s-).